
Career Fire
Fighter Dies in Fall from Roof at Apartment Building
Fire – New York
SUMMARY
On June 21, 2007, a
23-year-old male career fire fighter (the victim) died
after falling from the roof at a four-story apartment
building fire. When fire fighters arrived on scene,
light smoke and fire was showing from a 4th floor
window. The victim had just climbed the truck ladder to
the roof bulkhead and was attempting to lower himself to
the main roof when he fell. The roof saw (slung on the
victim’s back) shifted causing the victim to lose his
balance and fall to the ground. Fire fighters had been
on scene less than 3 minutes when the victim fell. The
victim was transported to a metropolitan hospital where
he succumbed to his injuries. Key contributing factors
to this incident include: judgment of the fire fighter
in deciding on a riskier means of moving from the roof
bulkhead to the main roof, the placement of the ladder
against the roof bulkhead rather than the main roof
which introduced additional fall risks for fire
fighters, the hazardous task of climbing a ladder while
laden with tools and equipment, and the method in which
the saw was carried which allowed the shifting saw to
put the fire fighter off balance.
NIOSH has concluded
that, to minimize the risk of similar occurrences, fire
departments should:
-
stress to fire fighters the importance of exercising
caution when working at elevation
- consider the location and placement of aerial
ladders to prevent fire fighters from climbing from
different elevations during fireground operations
- consider the use of portable scissor ladders to
facilitate access from an aerial ladder to the roof
- ensure that fire fighters communicate any
potential hazards to one another and ensure that
team continuity is maintained during roof operations
- evaluate the manner in which equipment is
harnessed or carried by fire fighters to prevent
loss of balance
- consider reducing the amount of equipment that
fire fighters must carry while climbing ladders
Manufacturers of fire
service saws should:
-
consider ergonomic design principles to reduce the
weight of ventilation saws
- consider developing improved carrying slings
INTRODUCTION
On June 21, 2007, a
23-year-old male career fire fighter was fatally injured
when he fell from the roof during a fire at a four-
story apartment building. On June 25, 2007, the U.S.
Fire Administration notified the National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) of this incident.
On July 24-26, 2007, a safety and occupational health
specialist from the NIOSH Fire Fighter Fatality
Investigation and Prevention Program investigated this
incident. The NIOSH investigator met with officials of
the fire department and with representatives from the
Uniformed Fire Officers Association (UFOA) and the
Uniformed Firefighters Association (UFA) which are
affiliated with the International Association of Fire
Fighters (IAFF). The investigator reviewed witness
statements of fire fighters and officers involved in the
incident, examined photographs and video of the
fireground, and reviewed the victim’s training records
and death certificate. The NIOSH investigator also
reviewed the department’s fireground standard operating
procedures (SOPs)1
and listened to the dispatch tape of this incident. The
incident site was visited, measured, and photographed.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
The fire department
involved in this incident consists of approximately
11,500 career fire fighters that serve a population of
over eight million in a geographic area of approximately
322 square miles.
TRAINING and EXPERIENCE
The State
of New York requires that fire departments train career
fire fighters to a level equivalent to National Fire
Protection Association (NFPA) Level II. The state also
requires 100 hours of annual in-service training.
The fire department
requires all fire fighters to complete a 23-week
training program at the department’s fire academy.
(Note: At the time the victim graduated from the academy
the program was 13 weeks). Fire fighter recruits
are instructed in the basics of fire suppression systems
and fire fighting tactics. After graduating from the
fire academy, the recruits go through a one year
probationary period.
The victim graduated
from the department’s fire academy in September 2005 and
had almost two years of fire fighting experience with a
truck company.
EQUIPMENT and PERSONNEL
There were 5 apparatus
and 30 fire fighters dispatched to the fire. The 911
call was received at 1654 hours and fire fighters were
dispatched at 1655 hours. Response listed in order of
arrival included:
- • 1657 hours
- Engine 216
(officer and 4 fire fighters)
Ladder 108 (officer and 5 fire fighters)
- • 1658 hours
- Engine 229
(officer and 4 fire fighters)
Ladder 146 (officer, the victim, and 4 fire
fighters)
- • 1659 hours
- Battalion Chief
35 (Incident Commander) and battalion fire fighter
Engine 230 (officer and 5 fire fighters)
PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
At the time of the
incident, the victim was wearing the full array of
personal protective clothing and equipment, consisting
of turnout gear (coat and pants), helmet, Nomex® hood,
gloves, boots, and a self-contained breathing apparatus
(SCBA) with an integrated personal alert safety system
(PASS). The victim was carrying a Halligan hook, a
Halligan bar, and a gasoline-powered roof saw in a
harness slung over his shoulder in bandolier fashion.
The victim was also equipped with a portable radio,
flashlight, safety harness and personal safety rope.
This equipment weighs approximately 110 pounds.
STRUCTURE
The structure involved
in this incident was a four-story industrial brick
building of class III construction, originally built in
the 1920s (see Photo
1). The building was originally a sewing
machine factory and had been illegally converted into
residential loft apartments in 2000. The building was 75
feet wide by 100 feet long and was equipped with
sprinklers, some of which were blocked because of the
illegal conversions. Each floor had four apartments and
interior construction was drywall over metal studs.
Exterior construction was solid brick with a flat tar
and asphalt roof. The building had two internal
stairwells, one of which was blocked on every floor,
with bulkheads on the roof at diagonal corners.
According to the fire
department, the cause and origin of the fire was an
unattended cigarette left on a 4th floor window sill
that ignited the wooden window frame. The fire was
confined to the window sill and adjacent interior
furnishings, but the plumes of smoke made the blaze
appear larger than it actually was. Some of the
occupants of the apartment building had already
evacuated as fire department apparatus arrived on scene.
WEATHER
The weather at the
time of the incident was clear with a temperature of
79°F and an average wind speed of 9 mph from the west.
The weather was not a factor in this incident.
INVESTIGATION
On June 21, 2007, at
approximately 1654 hours, a fire was reported on the 4th
floor of a 4-story apartment building. On arrival, fire
fighters saw fire and moderate white smoke in a window
on the top floor of the apartment building.
Ladder 108 (L108), the
1st due truck company, arrived at 1657 hours. After
positioning in front of the building, the L108 roof fire
fighter raised and placed the aerial ladder to the roof
at the center of the bulk head (see
Photo 2). (Note: A roof fire fighter is
responsible for ventilating the roof if necessary and
checking all sides of a building for trapped residents).
The victim (another roof fire fighter) arrived on scene
in Ladder 146 at 1658 hours. He dismounted the
apparatus, grabbed his tools and went to Ladder 108 to
access the roof.
The L108 roof fire
fighter climbed the ladder to the roof with the victim
climbing about 20 feet behind. He threw his Haligan bar
and hook to the roof when he reached the level of the
roof while still on the aerial ladder. The L108 roof
fire fighter dismounted the aerial ladder onto the top
of the bulkhead; he squatted between the bulkhead
parapet and the skylight (see
Photo 3). He vented some of the glass panes
in the bulkhead skylight and observed very light smoke.
He maneuvered to a safe area and lowered himself onto
the roof by hanging and dropping (see
Photo 4). (Note: From the top of the
bulkhead to the roof was approximately 9 feet). He
called to the victim, still climbing up the ladder that
he may need to bring the folding scissor ladder on the
tip of the aerial to access the roof from the bulkhead.
He proceeded to the opposite side of the roof to provide
vertical ventilation, looked over, opened the other
bulkhead door, and then heard a scream followed by a
MayDay radio transmission.
At 1701 hours, the victim fell approximately 60 feet to
the ground while attempting to maneuver down from the
top of the bulkhead to the top of the main roof parapet
wall. He continued to hold a hand tool in each hand.
(Note: It was 5’6” feet from the top of the bulkhead
coping to the top of the roof parapet wall). The
chauffeur of Ladder 108 observed that the roof saw
(slung over the victim’s shoulder) shifted during the
climb down from the bulkhead and the victim lost his
balance. The victim fell to the ground and landed on his
side and upper torso and sustained massive trauma to his
head, torso, and extremities. (Note: Besides the
weight shift from the saw, a loss of grip or footing
could have contributed to the fall).
During this time, fire
fighters from the 1st due engine company (Engine 216)
were stretching a 2½ inch hose line to the 4th floor
fire apartment. Fire fighters from the 2nd due engine
company (Engine 229) were assisting with the hose line
stretch. (Note: Since this was formerly an
industrial building, departmental SOPs mandate a 2½ inch
hose line). Fire fighters from the 3rd due engine
company (Engine 230) also assisted with the stretch from
Engine 216. The building’s sprinkler system was
containing the spread of the fire and the hose line was
not charged until after the fatal event.
Immediately after the
victim fell, a fire fighter from Ladder 108 radioed a
MayDay and rushed to aid the victim. Most of the members
of Engine 230 saw the victim fall. Fire fighters on the
ground immediately administered first
aid/CPR/stabilization and rushed the victim to an
awaiting ambulance. The victim was transported to a
metropolitan hospital where he succumbed to his
injuries.
CONTRIBUTING FACTORS
Occupational injuries
and fatalities are often the result of one or more
contributing factors or key events in a larger sequence
of events that ultimately result in the injury or
fatality. NIOSH investigators identified the following
items as key contributing factors in this incident that
ultimately led to the fatality:
-
judgment of the fire fighter in deciding on a
riskier means of moving from the roof bulkhead to
the main roof,
- the
placement of the ladder against the roof bulkhead
rather than the main roof which introduced
additional fall risks for fire fighters,
- the
hazardous task of climbing a ladder while laden with
tools and equipment, and
- the
method in which the saw was carried which allowed
the shifting saw to put the fire fighter off
balance.
CAUSE OF DEATH
According to the
medical examiner’s findings, the cause of death was
“blunt impact of head, torso and extremity with
fractures and visceral injuries.”
RECOMMENDATIONS
Recommendation #1:
Fire departments should stress to fire fighters the
importance of exercising caution when working at
elevation.
Discussion: Ascending
and descending ground or aerial truck ladders are a
common occurrence on the fireground.2
Ground and aerial ladders are used for fire fighting
activities like roof access, window and fire escape
rescues, ventilation, and fire suppression.3,
4
Fire fighters are expected to be in full structural fire
fighting gear and carry needed equipment and tools while
climbing ladders.5
This causes a safety concern when trying to maintain
three-point contact on a ladder while climbing with
tools.6
(Note: 3-point contact means you have 2 hands and 1 foot
or 1 hand and 2 feet in contact with the ladder at all
times). During this incident, the victim was exposed to
a four-story fall. He ascended the aerial ladder with
required structural fire fighting gear and
equipment/tools. Once exiting the tip of the aerial
ladder, he was on top of a bulkhead that was over nine
feet above the roof line. He made a decision to try and
lower himself to the roof instead of climbing down and
repositioning the ladder.
Recommendation #2: Fire departments should consider
location and placement of aerial ladders to prevent fire
fighters from climbing from different elevations during
fireground operations.
Discussion: Basic
aerial ladder placement on the fireground is determined
by the incident commander or ladder company officer.2
Proper ladder placement can be written into departmental
SOPs. These SOPs should stress awareness of items like
overhead structures, loose and irregular terrain, ground
obstructions, and soft ground.2
The ladder operator should also pay close attention to
the proper placement to achieve maximum stability and
correct ladder climbing angle, which can be met by
following manufacturer’s recommendations.2,7
During ventilation operations, a ladder may need to be
placed to access the roof of the building. The ladder
should be extended at least 6 feet above the roof line.4
During this incident, the aerial ladder was placed
against a bulkhead parapet wall instead of the roof
parapet. This may have been done to avoid placing the
ladder too close to the window on fire. The bulkhead
parapet wall was 5.5 feet higher than the roof parapet
thus exposing fire fighters to a fall risk while
descending to the roof. While both locations posed a
fall risk while climbing down to the roof, it would have
been preferable to locate the aerial ladder at the roof
parapet rather than the bulkhead.
Recommendation #3: Fire departments should consider the
use of portable scissor ladders to facilitate access
from an aerial ladder to a roof.
Discussion: During
this incident, the aerial ladder was initially placed at
a bulkhead on the roof. This bulkhead measured
approximately 9 feet above the roof. The first fire
fighter lowered himself over the side of the bulkhead
and then dropped to the roof without incident. The
second fire fighter (the victim) attempted to lower
himself to the adjacent roof parapet wall 5.5 feet below
and fell to his death. The aerial apparatus had a
portable scissor ladder mounted at the tip of the
aerial. Using the portable scissor ladder in this
incident would have been safer. It is recommended that
these portable ladders be used to assist in the
transition from an aerial ladder to a roof, especially
when the distance to the roof is 5 feet or more.2,
4
Recommendation #4:
Fire departments should ensure that fire fighters
communicate any potential hazards to one another and
ensure that team continuity is maintained during roof
operations.
Discussion: Team
continuity involves knowing who is on the team and who
is the team leader; staying within visual contact at all
times; communicating personal needs and observations to
the team leader; rotating to rehab and staging as a
team; and watching out for other team members.3
Following these basic rules helps prevent serious injury
and death by providing personnel with the added safety
net of fellow team members. Teams that enter a hazardous
environment together should leave together to ensure
that team continuity is maintained.8
During this incident, two fire fighters ascended an
aerial ladder to perform roof operations. The first fire
fighter arrived and exited the tip of the aerial ladder
onto the roof’s bulkhead. He lowered himself down from
the top of the bulkhead and went to the opposite side of
the roof, breaking visual and voice contact with the
victim. Fire fighters should communicate potential
hazards to their crew, ladder operator, and the incident
commander.
Recommendation #5:
Fire departments should evaluate the manner in which
equipment is harnessed or carried by fire fighters to
prevent loss of balance.
Discussion: This fire
department uses a strap/sling made from a section of
nylon webbing.1
This allows for a roof saw to be carried over the fire
fighter’s gear to permit the use of both hands while
climbing a ladder (see
Photo 5). This practice is taught at their
fire academy.1
Their training included proper attachment of a 50 inch
sling to each end of the saw and donning of it.1
While the victim was trying to descend to the roof
parapet from the bulkhead his roof saw shifted, throwing
him off balance, causing him to fall. In lieu of having
fire fighters sling the saw over their body, they could
possibly hoist it up to the roof with rope or if an
aerial ladder has attachments for securing tools at the
tip, these attachments could be used to elevate the
tools for roof operations.
Recommendation #6:
Fire departments should consider reducing the amount of
equipment that fire fighters must carry while climbing
ladders.
Discussion: Fire
departments determine what equipment will be carried and
utilized on the fireground by means of SOPs. The
equipment needed by one fire fighter for roof operations
can weigh as much as 110 pounds.1
This consists of basic structural fire fighting gear
(i.e., helmet, turnout gear, gloves, boots and SCBA),
Halligan hook, Halligan bar, rescue rope, roof saw, and
a portable radio. After being equipped with all of this
gear, the fire fighter may have to climb a ground or
aerial ladder to perform roof operations.2
The weight and bulk of the structural gear and tools may
cause a hazard on ladders when trying to maintain
three-point contact.6
The weight of the gear causes extra stress on the body
while climbing the ladder and even on the fireground.
Fire departments should consider alternative ways to get
essential fire fighting equipment to the roof of a
structure to perform roof operations. Aerial platform
trucks provide an enclosed platform basket for fire
fighters to stand with their equipment.4
The platform truck will elevate them to the roof line
without imposing additional physical stress on the fire
fighter. Alternatively, the platform truck could be used
to elevate the equipment to the roof line for fire
fighters to retrieve.
Recommendation #7:
Manufacturers of fire service saws should consider
ergonomic design principles to reduce the weight of
ventilation saws.
Discussion: Everyday
fire fighters encounter hazardous and unknown
conditions. They are required to wear protective gear
and carry equipment and tools needed to do their
life-saving tasks.3,9
One of the contributing factors in this incident was the
shifting of a ventilation saw that was worn over the
shoulder of the victim with a sling. In addition to the
weight of structural fire fighting gear and other
necessary tools carried by the victim, the roof saw
weighted an extra 23 pounds. Manufacturers of
ventilation saws currently used by the fire service
should consider applying ergonomic principles to reduce
the weight and size of these tools. Using a compact,
lightweight roof saw would reduce the physical loading
to fire fighters.
Recommendation #8:
Manufacturers of fire service saws should consider
developing improved carrying slings.
Discussion: During
this incident, a ventilation saw was outfitted by the
fire department with an aftermarket carrying sling/waist
strap harness. It was placed in the same manner as the
manufacturers’, but served a dual purpose as a carrying
sling and safety harness while cutting. It was observed
that while the victim was climbing down from the
bulkhead, the saw shifted, throwing him off balance.
Manufacturers should consider working with the fire
service to develop different sized slings for variations
in saw size and fire fighter stature. The goal is to
keep the saw as close to the body as possible, thus
limiting movement which can effect a fire fighter’s
balance.
REFERENCES
- Fire Department
[2007]. Standard operating procedures.
- Mittendorf, J
[1998]. Truck company operations. Saddle Brook, NJ:
Fire Engineering Books and Videos.
- International
Fire Service Training Association [1998]. Essentials
of fire fighting. 4th ed. Stillwater, OK: Oklahoma
State University, Fire Protection Publications.
- International
Fire Service Training Association [2000]. Aerial
apparatus driver/operator handbook. 1st ed.
Stillwater, OK: International Fire Service Training
Association.
- NFPA [2007]. NFPA
1500, Standard on fire department occupational
safety and health program. Quincy, MA: National Fire
Protection Association.
- CPWR [2005].
Fact Sheet #4, don’t fall for
it! Climbing ladders safely. Washington.
DC: Center to Protect Workers’ Rights.
[http://www.cpwr.com/pdfs/Sheet%204.pdf]
- NFPA [2003]. NFPA
1002, Standard on fire apparatus driver/operator
professional qualification. Quincy, MA: National
Fire Protection Association.
- National Fire
Academy Alumni Association [2000]. Firefighter’s
handbook: essentials of firefighting and emergency
response. Albany, NY: Delmar.
- NFPA [2007]. NFPA
1971, Standard on protective ensembles for
structural fire fighting and proximity fire
fighting. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection
Association.
INVESTIGATOR INFORMATION
This investigation was
conducted by CDR Steve Berardinelli, Safety and
Occupational Health Specialist with the Fire Fighter
Fatality Investigation and Prevention Program, Fatality
Investigations Team, Surveillance and Field
Investigations Branch, Division of Safety Research,
NIOSH located in Morgantown, WV. Stacy Wertman, Safety
and Occupational Health Specialist with the Fire Fighter
Fatality Investigation and Prevention Program assisted
in the preparation of this report. Technical reviews
were provided by Dr. Thomas Bobick, PhD, PE, CSP, CPE,
Research Safety Engineer, Protective Technology Branch,
Division of Safety Research, NIOSH and Deputy Chief
Colleen Walz, Pittsburgh Bureau of Fire.
photos
and Diagrams
|
|
Photo
1. Incident Structure.
(Ladder image is for reference purposes
only)
(NIOSH photo)
|
|
|
Photo 2.
Aerial View of Incident Scene.
(Photo Courtesy of Fire Department)
|
|
|
|
Photo 3. Aerial View of the Bulkhead on the Roof
of the Incident Structure.
(Photo Courtesy of Fire Department) |
|
|
Photo
4. Bulkhead on Roof of Incident Structure.
(NIOSH photo)
|
|
|
|
Photo 5. Roof Saw with Sling.
(Photo taken for demonstration purposes only)
(NIOSH photo) |
The
National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health (NIOSH), an institute
within the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC), is the federal
agency responsible for conducting
research and making recommendations for
the prevention of work-related injury
and illness. In fiscal year 1998, the
Congress appropriated funds to NIOSH to
conduct a fire fighter initiative. NIOSH
initiated the Fire Fighter Fatality
Investigation and Prevention Program to
examine deaths of fire fighters in the
line of duty so that fire departments,
fire fighters, fire service
organizations, safety experts and
researchers could learn from these
incidents. The primary goal of these
investigations is for NIOSH to make
recommendations to prevent similar
occurrences. These NIOSH investigations
are intended to reduce or prevent future
fire fighter deaths and are completely
separate from the rulemaking,
enforcement and inspection activities of
any other federal or state agency. Under
its program, NIOSH investigators
interview persons with knowledge of the
incident and review available records to
develop a description of the conditions
and circumstances leading to the deaths
in order to provide a context for the
agency’s recommendations. The NIOSH
summary of these conditions and
circumstances in its reports is not
intended as a legal statement of facts.
This summary, as well as the conclusions
and recommendations made by NIOSH,
should not be used for the purpose of
litigation or the adjudication of any
claim. For further information, visit
the program
website at www.cdc.gov/niosh/fire
or call toll free 1-800-CDC-INFO
(1-800-232-4636).
|
|